Data Strategy
Cloud Aware vs Cloud Native: 7 Differences You Need to Know

Cloud Aware vs Cloud Native: 7 Differences You Need to Know

Uncover the key distinctions between cloud aware and cloud native technologies in this comprehensive guide.

In today's rapidly evolving IT landscape, businesses are constantly seeking ways to maximize the potential of cloud technologies. Two terms that often come up in discussions about cloud computing are "cloud aware" and "cloud native." While they may sound similar, they represent distinct approaches to leveraging the cloud. Understanding the differences between these two concepts is critical for organizations looking to harness the true power of cloud computing. This article will delve into the fundamentals of cloud aware and cloud native, explore their evolution, highlight key differences, and examine the implications of choosing one over the other.

Understanding the Basics: Cloud Aware and Cloud Native

Before we explore the differences between cloud aware and cloud native, it's crucial to define each concept.

Cloud aware refers to applications or systems that have been designed to run in the cloud environment but are not necessarily optimized to fully exploit its potential. These applications are typically aware of basic cloud infrastructure services and can be deployed in the cloud, but they may still rely on components and dependencies that are not cloud-native or scalable.

For example, a cloud aware application might be hosted on a virtual machine in the cloud, taking advantage of the flexibility and scalability that the cloud offers. However, it may still use a traditional monolithic architecture, with tightly coupled components and limited ability to scale horizontally. While this application can provide some benefits in terms of flexibility and scalability, it often falls short when it comes to taking full advantage of the underlying cloud ecosystem.

On the other hand, cloud native refers to applications or systems that have been specifically architected to fully leverage the capabilities of the cloud. Cloud native applications are built using cloud-native principles and patterns, such as microservices, containers, and serverless computing. These applications are designed to be resilient, scalable, and highly available, making them ideal for modern, dynamic environments.

Cloud native applications embrace cloud infrastructure services, take advantage of auto-scaling capabilities, and can adapt seamlessly to changing demands. They are designed to be portable, allowing them to run on any cloud platform without vendor lock-in.

For instance, a cloud native application might be built using a microservices architecture, where different components of the application are decoupled and can be independently scaled. Each microservice can run in its own container, allowing for efficient resource utilization and easy deployment. Additionally, cloud native applications often leverage serverless computing, where code is executed in response to events, enabling automatic scaling and cost optimization.

In summary, while cloud aware applications can provide some benefits in terms of flexibility and scalability, they often lack the full potential of cloud native applications. Cloud native applications, on the other hand, are designed to fully exploit the capabilities of the cloud, offering resilience, scalability, and portability.

The Evolution of Cloud Technologies

The journey from cloud aware to cloud native represents the natural progression of cloud technologies. As cloud computing has matured, organizations have realized the limitations of cloud aware applications and have sought more advanced approaches to fully exploit the cloud's potential.

The Journey from Cloud Aware to Cloud Native

Cloud aware applications are often developed as a first step towards cloud adoption. They provide organizations with the ability to move their existing applications to the cloud without significant modifications. However, as businesses begin to understand the advantages of cloud-native architectures, they start embracing the principles and practices of cloud native development.

This transition involves rethinking application designs, embracing containerization, adopting microservices, and exploring serverless computing models. By adopting cloud-native methodologies, organizations can unlock the true agility and scalability of the cloud, enabling them to respond rapidly to changing market demands.

Containerization, a key aspect of cloud-native development, allows applications to be packaged with all their dependencies and run consistently across different computing environments. This approach not only enhances portability but also improves resource utilization and scalability. By leveraging container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes, organizations can automate the deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications, further streamlining their cloud operations.

Microservices architecture, another fundamental concept in cloud-native development, involves breaking down applications into smaller, loosely coupled services that can be developed, deployed, and scaled independently. This approach promotes agility, resilience, and innovation, as teams can work on different microservices concurrently without impacting the entire application. Additionally, microservices facilitate easier maintenance and updates, as changes can be made to specific services without disrupting the entire system.

Key Differences between Cloud Aware and Cloud Native

Now that we have a clear understanding of cloud aware and cloud native, let's dive into the key differences between these two approaches.

Difference 1: Architecture

One of the primary differences between cloud aware and cloud native lies in the architecture. Cloud aware applications typically follow a traditional monolithic architecture, where all components are tightly coupled. In contrast, cloud-native applications adopt a modular approach, using microservices architecture to enable independent scalability, resilience, and deployment of individual components.

This fundamental difference in architecture allows cloud-native applications to be more flexible and adaptable to changing requirements.

Difference 2: Scalability

Scalability is another crucial aspect that sets cloud aware and cloud native apart. Cloud aware applications can often scale vertically by adding more resources to existing servers. However, they may struggle to scale horizontally due to their monolithic nature.

Cloud native applications, on the other hand, are inherently designed for horizontal scalability. With the use of microservices and containers, cloud native applications can scale effortlessly by adding more instances of specific services as demand increases.

Difference 3: Performance

Cloud aware applications may experience performance limitations due to their reliance on legacy dependencies and monolithic architecture. While these applications can benefit from cloud infrastructure, they may not fully optimize the performance potential.

Cloud native applications prioritize performance optimization from the ground up. By leveraging containerization and microservices, cloud native applications can isolate and scale individual components while minimizing resource consumption.

Difference 4: Security

Security is another critical aspect where cloud aware and cloud native approaches differ. Cloud aware applications may inherit partial security measures from the underlying cloud infrastructure, but they may lack the level of control and customization offered by cloud-native solutions.

Cloud native applications follow security-by-design principles, integrating security measures into every layer of the application architecture. With the use of containerization and proper access controls, cloud native applications can enhance security and mitigate risks more effectively.

Difference 5: Cost Efficiency

Cost efficiency is a significant consideration for any organization looking to leverage cloud technologies. Cloud aware applications can benefit from cost optimization to some extent, but their reliance on legacy components and monolithic architecture can limit cost-saving opportunities.

Cloud native applications, being modular and highly scalable, allow organizations to take full advantage of cloud cost optimization strategies, such as auto-scaling and resource allocation based on demand. This results in better control over resource consumption and cost efficiency.

Difference 6: Maintenance and Updates

Maintenance and updates are critical aspects of any application's lifecycle. However, cloud aware applications may require manual intervention and careful coordination due to their tightly coupled and complex architecture.

Cloud native applications, with their modular architecture, allow for easier maintenance and updates. Components can be updated independently without affecting the entire application, reducing the risk of downtime and increasing overall system availability.

Difference 7: Flexibility and Adaptability

Lastly, cloud aware applications may lack the flexibility and adaptability of cloud native applications. Their reliance on legacy components and monolithic architecture may inhibit their ability to quickly adapt to changing business needs or adopt new technologies.

Cloud native applications, with their loosely coupled microservices architecture, can easily adapt to evolving requirements. This flexibility allows organizations to embrace new technologies and rapidly respond to market demands, giving them a competitive edge.

The Impact of Choosing Cloud Aware or Cloud Native

Now that we have explored the key differences between cloud aware and cloud native, it's essential to understand the implications of choosing one approach over the other.

Implications for Business Operations

Adopting a cloud aware approach can allow organizations to quickly migrate existing applications to the cloud, resulting in reduced infrastructure costs and increased flexibility. However, they may miss out on the full potential offered by cloud-native architectures, limiting their ability to scale rapidly and embrace emerging technologies.

Choosing a cloud-native approach, on the other hand, can significantly enhance business operations. By leveraging cloud-native principles and practices, organizations can build highly scalable, resilient, and portable applications that can adapt effortlessly to changing market demands.

Cloud-native applications can help organizations streamline development and deployment processes, reduce operational costs, and improve time to market, ultimately resulting in a competitive advantage.

Implications for IT Infrastructure

When it comes to IT infrastructure, opting for a cloud aware approach may require minimal changes to the existing infrastructure. However, it may limit the ability to fully exploit the capabilities of the cloud and hinder the organization's ability to scale and innovate.

Choosing a cloud-native approach requires a more significant investment in infrastructure and technology, such as container orchestration platforms and automation tools. However, this investment allows organizations to fully embrace the cloud's potential, enabling them to unlock new business opportunities and drive innovation.


In conclusion, understanding the differences between cloud aware and cloud native is crucial for organizations looking to make the most of cloud technologies. While cloud aware applications can provide basic benefits, adopting a cloud-native approach offers numerous advantages in terms of architecture, scalability, performance, security, cost efficiency, maintenance, and flexibility.

By embracing cloud-native principles and practices, organizations can modernize their applications, enhance their ability to scale and adapt to changing market demands, and gain a competitive edge in the digital landscape.

New Release
Table of Contents

Get in Touch to Learn More

See Why Users Love CastorDoc
Fantastic tool for data discovery and documentation

“[I like] The easy to use interface and the speed of finding the relevant assets that you're looking for in your database. I also really enjoy the score given to each table, [which] lets you prioritize the results of your queries by how often certain data is used.” - Michal P., Head of Data